Development and Validation of a simple and rapid RP-HPLC method for the simultaneous estimation of Amlodipine and Atorvastatin in Tablet Dosage Form

 

Celina Nazareth*, Shefali Naik, Anwesha Dourado

Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, P. E. S’s Rajaram and Tarabai Bandekar College of Pharmacy, Farmagudi, Goa, India - 403401   

*Corresponding Author E-mail: celinanaz@yahoo.com

 

ABSTRACT:

A simple and rapid reversed phase high performance liquid chromatographic method has been developed for the simultaneous estimation of Amlodipine and Atorvastatin in tablet dosage form. The separation was achieved on a Waters Symmetry C-18 column, (150mm × 3.9mm × 5µ particle size) using Acetonitrile: KH2PO4 buffer (pH 5.8) in the proportion of 45:55, v/v as mobile phase, at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. Detection was carried out at 254nm using VW detector. Amlodipine and Atorvastatin gave a retention time of 2.2±0.2 min and 3.2±0.2 min respectively. The developed method was validated for specificity, linearity, accuracy, precision and robustness as per ICH guidelines. The method was found to be specific as there was no interference seen in blank and placebo injections at the retention time of the drugs. The calibration curves were found to be linear with r2 = 0.999 for both the drugs. The method was found to be accurate as the mean percent recovery of Amlodipine and Atorvastatin was within the acceptance criteria. The method was found to be precise with %RSD less than 2. The method was found to be robust as small, deliberate changes in chromatographic conditions did not alter the results of analysis significantly. The method was applied in analysis of marketed formulation and the % assay was found to be within limits.

 

KEYWORDS: Amlodipine, Atorvastatin, RP-HPLC, validation, simultaneous estimation, tablet dosage form.

 

 


INTRODUCTION:

Atorvastatin calcium is a hypolipidemic agent which inhibits HMG-CoA reductase enzyme involved in lipid synthesis. Amlodipine besylate is a Calcium channel blocker used in the treatment of hypertension. The combination is used to treat high blood pressure (hypertension), chest pain (angina), and to lower the risk of stroke, heart attack and other heart complications in people with type 2 diabetes, coronary heart disease or other risk factors1.

 

 

Literature survey reveals that analysis of Atorvastatin calcium and Amlodipine besylate either alone or in combination has been attempted previously using UV Spectroscopy2-4, Fluorimetry5 and RP-HPLC methods6-21. However, most of the HPLC methods employ mobile phases having extreme pH values or a high buffer concentration. The retention time of the last eluting drug ranged from 3.71 to 8.6 mins. Efficiency in analysis could be achieved if retention time could be reduced and inexpensive columns were employed, which would thereby decrease the time of analysis and bring about savings in cost. Further, the use of simpler solvents, moderate pH of mobile phase and lower buffer concentration would help to prolong column life. Hence, the aim of the present work was to develop and validate a simple and rapid RP-HPLC method for the simultaneous estimation of Amlodipine and Atorvastatin in tablet dosage form. Further an attempt was made to adopt a tablet drop method in place of the conventional tablet crush method for the assay of tablet formulation.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Chemicals and Reagents:

Atorvastatin calcium and Amlodipine besylate were procured from Vergo Pharma research laboratory, Verna-Goa and Cipla Pvt. Ltd. Verna-Goa respectively as gift samples. The tablet formulation ‘Zivast AM’ was purchased from a local retail pharmacy. All chemicals and reagents were of HPLC / AR grade.

 

Instrumentation:

An Agilent HPLC of 1120 Compact LC series with Open lab software having VW detector was used for the analysis.

 

Preparation of Mobile phase:

Mobile phase consisting of pH 5.8 Potassium di-hydrogen phosphate buffer (20mM) and Acetonitrile in a ratio of 55:45, v/v was employed.

 

Preparation of Diluent:

 A solution of 45% Acetonitrile in water was used as Diluent / Blank.

 

Preparation of Test sample:

Five tablets were weighed and transferred directly to 100mL volumetric flask. To this 70mL of diluent was added, vortexed and sonicated for 10 minutes. Volume was made up to the mark with diluent and mixed well. This was centrifuged for 10 minutes at 5000 rpm. From the supernatant 2mL was taken and transferred to a 100mL volumetric flask and volume was made up to the mark with diluent and injected in the HPLC system.

 

Preparation of placebo sample:

The amount of placebo powder equivalent to 5 tablets was weighed and transferred to 100mL volumetric flask and procedure was adopted as for test preparation.

 

Chromatographic conditions:

Column: Waters Symmetry C-18 (150mm×3.9mm×5µ)

Column temperature: 30°C

Mobile phase: Acetonitrile: 20mM Phosphate buffer pH 5.8 (45:55, v/v)

Flow rate: 1.0 mL/min

Injection volume: 20 µL

Run time: 5 minutes

Detection wavelength: 254nm

 

Validation:

The mixed drug standard solution was injected six times to establish the system suitability. The developed method was validated for specificity, linearity, range, accuracy, precision, and robustness as per ICH guidelines22.

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:

Initial trials were conducted for the simultaneous estimation of Amlodipine and Atorvastatin using mobile phase consisting of Phosphate buffer and Acetonitrile in different proportions. Mobile phase consisting of Phosphate buffer pH 5.8 (20mM): Acetonitrile (55:45, v/v) with flow rate of 1 mL/min and a column temperature of 30°C was found to be optimal for obtaining well defined and resolved peaks. 


 

 

Figure 1: Chromatogram for mixed standard of Amlodipine and Atorvastatin

 


Table 1: Summary of system suitability parameters

System suitability parameters

Observed value

Amlodipine

Atorvastatin

Retention time in mins

2.261

3.245

%RSD of for peak area (n=6)

0.7

0.28

Theoretical plates

3803

4363

Tailing factor

1.39

1.19

Resolution

6.29

 

Six replicates of mixed drug standard were injected and chromatograms were recorded. A representative chromatogram is depicted in Fig. 1 and results of system suitability are shown in Table 1.

 

The mean retention times for Amlodipine and Atorvastatin were found to be 2.261 minutes and 3.245 minutes respectively. The system was found suitable as the results complied with the acceptance criteria.

The method was validated according to ICH guidelines for specificity, linearity, range, precision, accuracy, and robustness.


 

 

Figure 2: Chromatograms showing specificity for Blank

 

 

Figure 3: Chromatograms showing specificity for placebo

 


The blank and placebo solutions were injected to establish the specificity of the method. The representative chromatograms are shown in Fig. 2 and Fig. 3 respectively

 

The method was found to be specific as there was no interference seen in blank and placebo injections at the retention time of the drugs.

Linearity was determined at five levels over the concentration range of 25% to 150% of the standard concentration. Calibration curves were plotted and slope, intercept and correlation coefficient for each drug were estimated. The calibration curves are shown in Fig. 4 and Fig. 5 and results of linearity studies are given in the Table 2.


 

 

Figure 4: Calibration curve for Amlodipine

 

Figure 5: Calibration curve for Atorvastatin

 

Table 2: Linearity data for Amlodipine and Atorvastatin

Parameters

Amlodipine

Atorvastatin

Linearity range

0.89-5.39 (µg/mL)

2.49-14.98 (µg/mL)

Regression equation

Intercept

-17400

34998

Correlation coefficient (r2)

0.999

0.999

 

Table 3: Results for accuracy study for Amlodipine and Atorvastatin

Recovery levels    (n=3)

Amlodipine

Atorvastatin

Mean % recovery

% RSD

Mean % recovery

% RSD

80%

99.23

1.12

102.35

0.54

100%

100.83

1.25

102.4

0.09

120%

99.36

1.21

101.93

0.39

Acceptance criteria

97-103%

Less than 2%

97-103%

Less than 2%

 

Table 4: Data for precision analysis of Amlodipine and Atorvastatin

Average RT (mins)

Theoretical plates (USP)

Tailing factor

% Assay

% RSD

Amlodipine

2.26

3804

1.36

91.7

0.37

Atorvastatin

3.24

4366

1.17

108.2

0.27

Acceptance criteria

-

More than 2000

Less than 2

90-110%

Less than 2%

 


Accuracy was determined by performing % recovery in triplicate at 80%, 100% and 120% of the test concentration. The results are given in Table 3.

 

Precision of the method was determined by performing repeatability studies on six injections of standard solution. Resulting chromatograms were recorded and % RSD for the peak area was calculated. The results of precision analysis are given in Table 4.

 

Robustness of the method was established by making small deliberate changes in the flow rate, column oven temperature, composition of Mobile Phase and pH of the buffer. The system suitability parameters were measured and it was found that small, deliberate changes in chromatographic conditions did not alter the results of analysis significantly.

 

 

 

The assay of the formulation was performed employing the tablet drop technique. The mean % assay for Amlodipine was found to be 91.90% and for Atorvastatin it was found to be 107.91% which was within the acceptance limits of 90-110%.

 

CONCLUSION:

A simple, rapid, specific, accurate, precise and robust reversed phase high performance liquid chromatographic method has been developed for the simultaneous estimation of Amlodipine and Atorvastatin in tablet dosage form. The developed method imparted efficiency in analysis as with reduced retention time there was decrease in the time of analysis which resulted in savings in cost. Further, the use of simpler solvents, moderate pH of mobile phase and lower buffer concentration would help to prolong column life. Also, by adopting a tablet drop method in place of the conventional tablet crush method for the assay of tablet formulation convenience in analysis along with minimization in error while transfer of weighed tablet powder was achieved. Thus, the developed method can be used as a powerful quality control tool for the analysis of Amlodipine and Atorvastatin in bulk or in their combined tablet formulation.

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:

The authors are thankful to Cipla Pvt. Ltd. Verna-Goa for gift sample of Amlodipine besylate and to Vergo Pharma Research Laboratory, Verna-Goa for gift sample of Atorvastatin calcium.

 

CERTIFICATE OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST:

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

 

REFERENCES:

1.      Tripathi KD. Essentials of Medical Pharmacology. Jaypee Brothers medical publishers Ltd., New Delhi. 2014.

2.      Kumbhar S.T, Jadhav S.D, Bhatia N.M, Bhatia M.S. A Development and validation of derivative spectrophotometric method for estimation of Atorvastatin calcium and Amlodipine besylate in tablet dosage form. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences.  2011; 3(4):195-197.

3.      Devi R., Ramakrishna S. New spectrophotometric method for the simultaneous Estimation of Amlodipine Besylate and Atorvastatin Calcium in tablet dosage forms. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2010; 2(4):215-219. 

4.      Chaudhary BG, Patel AB. Simultaneous Spectrophotometric Estimation of Atorvastatin calcium and Amlodipine besylate in Tablet dosage form. International Journal of Chem Tech Research. 2010; 2(1):633-639. 

5.      Moussa BA, El-Zaher AA, Mahrouse MA, Ahmed MS. Simultaneous determination of Amlodipine besylate and Atorvastatin calcium in binary mixture by Spectrofluorimetry and HPLC coupled with Fluorescence detection. Analytical Chemistry Insights. 2013; 4(8):107-115.

6.      Vidhyadhara S, Sasidhar RLC, Satyaprasanna P, Aruna K, Aruna KG. RP-HPLC method development for simultaneous estimation of Atorvastatin and Amlodipine besylate in bulk and pharmaceutical dosage forms. Plegia Research Library. Der Pharmacia Sinica. 2015; 6(10):1-7. 

7.      Nataraj KS, Alekhya K,  SurendraBabu B, Gnananath K, Bindu C. Analytical method development and validation of simultaneous estimation of Amlodipine besylate and Atorvastatin calcium by RP-HPLC method. Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research. 2015; 7(4):35-41.

8.      Hafez HM, Elshanawany AA, Abdelaziz LM, Mohram MS. Development of a Stability-Indicating HPLC Method for Simultaneous Determination of Amlodipine Besylate and Atorvastatin Calcium in Tablets. Austin J Anal Pharm Chem. 2014; 1(6): 01-011.

9.      Ubale M. RP-HPLC Method for Simultaneous Determination of Amlodipine Besylate and Atorvastatin Calcium. Application to Commercially available drug products. Int. Arch. App. Sci. Technology. 2014; 5(1): 22-27.

10.   Alnowaiser MA. Simultaneous determination of Amlodipine and Atorvastatin in Caduet® tablets using HPLC. American Journal of Applied Sciences. 2013; 10(8):849-852.

11.   Turabi ZH, Khatatbeh OA. Stability indicating RP-HPLC method development and validation for the simultaneous determination of Atorvastatin and Amlodipine in pharmaceutical dosage forms. Journal of Pharmacy Research. 2013; 2(12):8-13.

12.   Eranki RV, Inti G, Jayaraman V, Vidiyala SR, Ramulu J. New Stability Indicating Method for Quantification of Impurities in Amlodipine and Atorvastatin calcium Tablets by validated HPLC. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research Scholars. 2013; 2(4): 458-471. 

13.   Silvia I, Klara K, Lucia MD. Simultaneous determination of Atorvastatin and Amlodipine in industrial tablet by Apparent Content Curve and HPLC method. Acta Medica Marisiensis. 2013; 59(1):44-48. 

14.    Dinda SC, Desireddy RB, Kumar PJ, Chand SA, Rao PS, Kumar BA. Development and validation of RP-HPLC method for quantitative analysis of Amlodipine besylate in Pure and Pharmaceutical Formulation. Research J. Pharm. And Tech.  2013; 6(2):204-207. 

15.   Momin MA, Islam MM, Rahman KH, Anisuzzaman SM. Development and Validation of assay method of Amlodipine Tablet by HPLC. International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Phytopharmacological Research. 2012; 2(2):109115.

16.   Sharma AK, Dharamsi A. Development and validation of RP-HPLC and spectrophotometric method for the simultaneous estimation of Atorvastatin and Amlodipine in pharmaceutical dosage forms. International Journal of  Pharmaceutical Sciences And Research. 2012; 3(4):1202-1207.

17.   Ahmed M, Manohara YN, Ravi MC. RP-HPLC method development and validation for simultaneous estimation of Atorvastatin calcium and Amlodipine besylate. International Journal of chem. Tech Research. 2012; 4: 337-345. 

18.   Masud AA, Rahman MS, Hasan M, Ripon MKH, Khan AR, Islam MR, Ahasan MM,  Uddin MR. Validated RP-HPLC method for  simultaneous estimation of Amlodipine besylate and Atorvastatin calcium in combined tablet dosage form. Bangladesh Research Publication Journal.  2011; 6(1):52-56. 

19.   Acharjya SK, Mathrusri AM, Koya S. Liquid chromatographic method for simultaneous estimation of Atorvastatin calcium and Amlodipine besylate in pharmaceutical dosage forms. International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences. 2010; 1(4):161-170. 

20.   Shah DA, Bhatt KK, Mehta RS, Baldania SL, Gandhi TR. Stability Indicating RPHPLC estimation of Atorvastatin calcium and Amlodipine besylate in Pharmaceutical Formulations. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2008; 70(6): 754-760.

21.   Zaheer Z, Farooqui MN, Mangle AA, Nikalje AG. Stability indicating high performance liquid chromatographic determination of Atorvastatin calcium in Pharmaceutical dosage form. African Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 2008; 2(10):204-210.  

22.   Q2B Validation of Analytical Procedures. http://www.ich.org/fileadmin/ Public_Web_Site/ICH_Products/Guidelines/Quality/Q2_R1/Step4/Q2_R1__ Guideline.pdf (15 October 2015).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Received on 09.09.2018         Modified on 03.11.2018

Accepted on 26.12.2018         © RJPT All right reserved

Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2019; 12(4):1875-1879.

DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X.2019.00316.0